Duo admits bribery and criminal intimidation over computer sale at university

2016-9-6

A marketing manager of an events organiser and a then representative of a computer distributor, charged by the ICAC, today (Tuesday) admitted conspiring to offer a bribe of $100,000 and a quantity of computer products to a then president of the Students’ Union (SU) of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU), and to criminally intimidate the president in relation to the sale of computers at PolyU.

Chak Hok-ming, 33, a marketing manager of Celebrity Limited (CL), and Wong Ka-ming, 26, a then representative of Sunlite Computronics Limited (Sunlite), pleaded guilty at the Kowloon City Magistracy to two joint charges of conspiracy to offer an advantage to an agent, contrary to Section 9(2)(a) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance and Section 159A of the Crimes Ordinance.

Chak and Wong also admitted a joint charge of conspiracy to commit criminal intimidation, contrary to Section 24(b)(ii) and Section 159A of the Crimes Ordinance.

Principal Magistrate Mr Peter Law Tak-chuen remanded Chak in the custody of the Correctional Services Department until September 19 this year for mitigation and sentence, pending a background report.

Wong had his sentencing adjourned to October 18 this year. He was granted cash bail of $5,000, and ordered to surrender his travel documents, not to leave Hong Kong and to report to the Police once a week.

The court heard that each year, PolyU and its SU jointly organised a Notebook Ownership Programme (the Programme). Under the Programme, selected brands of computer products were offered to students, staff members and alumni of PolyU to purchase at discount prices through the respective computer brand distributor.

In mid-March 2015, the president of the SU of PolyU received a cold call from Wong, who introduced himself as a representative of CL, an events organiser.

Chak and Wong claimed at a meeting held on March 27, 2015 with the SU president that they were engaged by Sunlite to secure business in the 2015 Programme. They asked the SU president to arrange for Sunlite to be the distributor in the event and promised to offer him a sum of $100,000 in return.

The court heard that at a second meeting held on April 1, 2015 with the SU president, Chak elaborated that Sunlite was the distributor of two computer brands in Hong Kong.

At the meeting, Chak and Wong asked that the two brands be selected for the 2015 Programme, and reiterated to offer $100,000 to the SU president as a reward. The duo also suggested sponsoring PolyU and/or its SU with computer products worth $200,000 or $200,000 cash.

The court heard that after the SU president declined the offers in a subsequent phone call, he met with Chak and Wong again on April 10, 2015.

Chak claimed that he was in possession of materials showing that persons previously holding the office of the SU had had under-the-table dealings with a competitor of Sunlite, and threatened to publish those materials if the two brands mentioned were not selected for the 2015 Programme.

Chak and Wong warned that as a result, the reputation of the SU would be undermined, the court was told.

PolyU has rendered full assistance to the ICAC during its investigation.

The prosecution was today represented by prosecuting counsel Bernard Yuen, assisted by ICAC officer Monica Lo.
Back to Index